Yes. My process is designed to adapt to whatever level of integration your agency prefers. If your team works locally, your project managers can simply send over standard files or .xliff exports from their CAT [...]
Yes, absolutely. Flexibility is key to reducing linguist friction, so I can deliver post-editing files in whichever format best fits your agency's pipeline and your translators' preferences. Standard delivery options include fully compatible XLIFF files [...]
Linguist buy-in is the single greatest hurdle in any AI-assisted workflow. My approach is to neutralize this resistance by removing the standard friction points: providing genuinely superior draft quality, giving them active input into the [...]
Yes. In fact, frontier LLMs perform exceptionally well with highly specialized domains, especially when paired with clear glossaries, translation memories, or reference materials. Technical, medical, and healthcare content often yields incredibly strong baseline drafts—even without [...]
That is not a problem at all. The workflow can start completely from scratch. If you don't have existing translation assets, we can easily bootstrap the process using two highly effective methods. First, we can [...]
Yes, I can integrate your translation memories (TMs), term bases (TBs), style guides, and other resources into my process, all while keeping your central databases secure. Of course, I am always happy to sign and [...]
My primary workflow is built on frontier large language models (LLM) accessed via enterprise APIs (primarily OpenAI). This is completely distinct from the public ChatGPT interface or consumer subscription plans. The enterprise API enforces strict [...]
Project handoff is exactly like a regular translation assignment. You send me the source files, and I return context-aware, AI-generated drafts fully optimized for your human linguists to post-edit. Once your translators are done, I [...]
